<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shure E4C! &#8230;and what of the future widescreen ipod?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/</link>
	<description>my part of the web</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 02:19:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Healthy Disregard for the Impossible &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iPod Touch</title>
		<link>http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>A Healthy Disregard for the Impossible &#187; Blog Archive &#187; iPod Touch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in March, I wrote that I would love to see the next iPhone without the telephone functionality as a future ipod.  It was probably expected by many, but when the announcement came about the new iPod Touch, I was happy to see the form factor and also that what I desired came to fruition (sans the voip) but was disappointed with the storage capacity.  Given some time, the iPod Touch may end up taking the place of the iPod Classic as the regular iPod when storage capacities allow. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in March, I wrote that I would love to see the next iPhone without the telephone functionality as a future ipod.  It was probably expected by many, but when the announcement came about the new iPod Touch, I was happy to see the form factor and also that what I desired came to fruition (sans the voip) but was disappointed with the storage capacity.  Given some time, the iPod Touch may end up taking the place of the iPod Classic as the regular iPod when storage capacities allow. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike hunt</title>
		<link>http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>mike hunt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 06:49:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moseschoi.com/2007/02/24/shure-e4c-and-what-of-the-future-widescreen-ipod/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>how&#039;re the E4s??  
I&#039;d like to get my own pair someday.
Until then ill be rocking my iBuds.
I&#039;m expecting your review.

Time to fix myself a hot plate.
Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how&#8217;re the E4s??<br />
I&#8217;d like to get my own pair someday.<br />
Until then ill be rocking my iBuds.<br />
I&#8217;m expecting your review.</p>
<p>Time to fix myself a hot plate.<br />
Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
